INVITE MAX BORDERS TO SPEAK

    What Is Decentralization & Why Does Cryptocurrency Matter?

    The Social Singularity

    By Max Borders

    Decentralization has a Manifesto

    Decentralization is not a choice, but an inevitability. Thankfully, the process can liberate people from poverty, end acrimonious politics, and help humanity avoid the robot apocalypse. Social Evolution founder, Max Borders, makes the case in this compelling manifesto.

    Buy The Book

    A Speaker for Visionaries

    The first rule of keynote speaking is: Don’t be boring. The second rule? Help your audience get smarter by leaving them transformed by the message. Invite Max Borders to speak at your event and guarantee your audience will be inspired, engaged and edified.

    Invite Author To Speak

    Understand the process of technological and social change

    In this decentralization manifesto, futurist Max Borders shows that humanity is already building systems that will “underthrow” great centers of power.

    Explore the promise of a decentralized world

    • Reorganize to collaborate and compete with AI.
    • Operate within networks of superior collective intelligence.
    • Rediscover our humanity and embrace values for an age of connection.

    An Excerpt From "The Social Singularity"

    EVERY INNOVATION is an act of subversion.

    Just before Satoshi Nakamoto published his 2008 white paper on the rudiments of Bitcoin, it must have been a bit like holding a lit match over dry forest underbrush. Did he linger for a moment before hitting enter?

    Maybe in that moment he closed his eyes and saw flashes from the future: of a thousand pimply geeks becoming millionaires overnight. Of Ross Ulbricht, Silk Road’s Dread Pirate Roberts, being led away in handcuffs. Of mutant strains, copycats, forks, and tokens competing in an entire ecosystem of cryptocurrencies as in a digital coral reef. Of booms and busts and troughs of disillusionment.

    We don’t know. But we do know one thing about Satoshi Nakamoto: he hit enter.

    A coder strings together lines of instruction. Once he publishes his code, there is a potential butterfly effect. Technological change, happening moment to moment around us, adds up quickly. Before you know it, people everywhere are taking rides with strangers. Bangladeshi women ply their produce trade on smartphones. Every wingbeat is a potential gale of creative destruction. A billion lines of code, created by millions of coders, represent innumerable wing beats. Some are amusements. Others are bold experiments in social transformation.

    Innovators’ work reorients us by changing our incentives, which changes our behaviors. Or at least that’s what I’ll argue. And the work of subversive innovators changes the game. By the way, subversive innovation is not the same thing as disruptive innovation—though I doff my hat to Clayton Christensen. Where disruptive innovations in Christensen’s sense “make products and services more accessible and affordable, thereby making them available to a much larger population,”79 subversive innovations, whether or not they also qualify as disruptive in that sense, are those that have the potential to replace long-accepted mediating structures of society.

    These structures are the hierarchies we trust and accept as a given. They are now vulnerable. Banks. Universities. Government itself. In other words, subversive innovation has the power to eliminate middlemen. When we consider all the mediating structures in the contemporary world, the implications are staggering. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

    The Singularity Is Somewhat Near

    Here’s a striking number: 97,900,000. That’s how many results Google says the search term “artificial intelligence” returns as of this writing—and it will probably be higher by the time you read this. From chess-playing supercomputers to robot overlords, the idea of thinking machines has become something of a worldwide obsession. How long before we simply commune with AI in our heads as if consulting some benevolent oracle?

     

    Among the 97,900,000 results, we’d surely find references to John von Neumann, the polymath and inventor. In 1950, von Neumann wrote: “The accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life give the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue.”80 Maybe some sentient AI in the future will honor von Neumann as a kind of ur-creator, along with Babbage, Turing, and Wiener, if such honors can be coded.

     

    But what is a singularity? Or, more specifically, what is the technological singularity? In the 1960s, I. J. Good offered a clue:

    Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an “intelligence explosion,” and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.

    Science fiction author Vernor Vinge ran with Good’s great idea. And in a now- famous 1993 essay, Vinge describes a not-so-distant future in which machine superintelligence has brought the human age to an end. “Large computer networks (and their associated users) may ‘wake up’ as a superhumanly intelligent entity,” Vinge writes.

     

    What does it mean for machines to wake up, exactly?

    Continue.

    Recent Articles

    • Welcome to Social Evolution.

      Dubai skyline among clouds courtesy of Vertical Dubai We’re committed to liberating humanity through innovation More regimes have been brought, piecemeal, to their knees by what was once called “Irish democracy,” the silent, dogged resistance,

      LEARN MORE
    • Beware the Universal Basic Income

      Photography by midzz at Deviant Art. Reasons to be skeptical of a UBI, plus a brief sketch of decentralized alternatives Not since the carbon tax has there been a proposal hotter than that of the universal basic income (UBI). Big Tech luminaries suc

      LEARN MORE
    • How We Become the Social Safety Net

      Human Fractals and Decentralized Alternatives to a UBI (DISCs) See art by SPCPETEW at Deviant Art Imagine a condition in which we have created our own social safety nets. That is, the safety nets are not created for us by some authority. Through se

      LEARN MORE
    • The Death of Political Theory

      By Richard Cederfjard at Deviant Art Ideology Dies One Small Social Experiment at a Time Greetings from the post-ideological era. It’s early still, but what innovators and entrepreneurs are creating right now is about to reorganize society as we k

      LEARN MORE
    • Cryptopsychedelic: Powerful Therapies for the Decentralization Age

      Part one in a series on the convergence of crypto technologies and psychedelics Art by Drunvalo Melchizedek at Psychedelic Adventure About a year ago, Joel’s life was a mess. He was overweight. He suffered frequent bouts of depression. And he could

      LEARN MORE
    • On “Curing” Authoritarianism

      Can Psychedelic Augmentation Prepare Us for Societies of the Future? “Double Boxed” by teundenouden at Deviant Art What is the difference between a disease and a disposition? And what if there were compounds that were just as effective at changi

      LEARN MORE
    • It’s Not Cambridge Analytica. It’s Our System of Government

      Let’s be honest: We’re set up for a democracy of rubes and that scares us Source: Deviant Art Artist: Oddities by Ernie The coordinated outrage against Cambridge Analytica is brilliant strategy. What better way to neutralize your opposition in a

      LEARN MORE
    • Before the Violence Strikes

      Photo by Rakesh Bakshi, International Business Times, Getty Images Violence is a fact of life. And yet, we should continue to do what we can to reduce it. Questions around policies are debatable. But we’re not interested in policy debates here, as

      LEARN MORE
    • Towards a Synthesist Movement

      Triaxial Weaving by Tim Tyler Weaving Healthy Values Together Beyond Political In-Groups The first instinct for most partisans or ideologues is to dig in one’s heels and cling to a checklist of group-identity criteria. Identification with one’s

      LEARN MORE
    • The Social Singularity is Here

      Well, the book anyway. It’s been a while since I’ve written. One reason is I’ve been gearing up for the launch of The Social Singularity. If you’re curious about the book, you can get it and help tweak the Amazon algorithm. If you’d like to

      LEARN MORE